
[Website] Help with site theme redesign
Posted Tuesday, 15 September, 2009 - 19:35 by the Fiddler| Project: | The Open Toolkit library |
| Version: | all versions |
| Component: | Website |
| Category: | support request |
| Priority: | normal |
| Assigned: | Unassigned |
| Status: | closed |
Description
Hello all,
I am looking for feedback for a new site theme.
If you have a few moments to spare, please select the "community2" theme in your account settings ("My account" -> "Edit"). Make sure to refresh your browser cache (just press F5) and simply browse the site for a while. You can revert to the previous theme at any time.
Once you have seen the new layout, post your impressions:
- How did you find the new layout and color theme? Did you prefer it to the previous one?
- Did you encounter any glitches, like misplaced or missing items?
- Is the site easy or hard to navigate?
- Thoughts on the new frontpage?
- Any other suggestions for improvement?
Please post your impressions and make suggestions for improvement. Don't forget to mention your browser and OS if you encounter any glitches!


Comments
#1
Fixed footer layout and background image.
Fixed default page after login.
#2
I like it. Per your questions,
1. Color scheme looks good to me. I might suggest a few minor tweaks, like make the border on the blocks a little darker, or a little thicker (maybe 2px)? I don't know if you've tried that, it might look worse. I like the more efficient use of space in the layout.
2. I don't know if it's a glitch, but in Internet Explorer... (just kidding :). Actually, one thing I find a bit distracting is the "underlines" beneath header text (I'm using Firefox, btw). It bothers me a bit that the text overlaps them. Also, maybe it's just my crappy laptop screen, but the gray underlines in the light blue blocks don't have enough contrast, so it's almost like they are not there.
3. The site seems about the same to navigate, but then I am used to the way Drupal works. How do you feel about drop down menus at the top? I'm not a fan of the placement of the breadcrumb trail in the upper left, above the blocks.
4. The new front page looks very nice. I especially like the mix of fonts and font styles. What fonts did you use?
5. I'd suggest adding an OpenTK logo & banner to the area above the menu at the top.
#3
Thanks.
#4
Looking good!
However I think the underlines of the block-titles are a little too visible. Maybe either be a little farther from the text, or a shade of gray instead of black. (if that is possible at all - maybe using a HR instead of underlining?)
#5
Better now?
#6
Yep!
#7
1. Slightly better because it's more elegant, with clean lines. The current has a richer style, but the new one is minimalistic (in a good way).
2. In Firefox:
|||http://www.opentk.com/doc||| the |||
||| is misplaced
In a quick look everything seems solid. :)
3. Very easy to navigate (visually and by usage A+)
4-5. Nice, for graphics you need only 2 shiny download buttons!
Other information that would be useful in frontpage:
- Projects using OpenTK (reference to other developers that are not members of community, the style would be just like a catalog, might be good to convert the Contributed section to a catalog section)
- Quicklinks
- The OpenTK Team (has credits, some info, persons and roles, donate button, e.t.c.)
- Contact developers (mail lists, chat rooms, addresses, how to join... other useful stuff for new developers)
- Help (links to documentation, wikis, youtube channels, friendly resources)
- Submit Content (find a way letting users upload content. let users make everything they want and send it to the OpenTK Team, it will enhance the "contribute" factor. Is it an example? Is it a video tutorial? Is it a tutorial? Is it a 3D Model of the OpenTK logo? Most people do not mind making stuff, the problem is "where can they be used to come handy?").
P.S. The website generally is very good, has many features and is very simple. I would like to know more about it (I work as a web developer, I am impressed, that's why I am curious :P )...
#8
Maybe my suggestion was not very clear in words, here's a picture of the header
#9
#10
Updates:
Still a lot of optimization left to do wrt image sizes and number of html requests per page.